Pornography has come out from its dark corner of popular culture to become mainstream fashion influencers, and designers welcome its subversive glamour with open arms.
Rocco Siffredi transformed his Dsquared2 show into a gay cruising fantasy for male audiences. Did this cross any lines? No. After all, who wouldn’t enjoy some nudity in their entertainment?
Why does fashion bet on porn?
Since high and low cultures have increasingly blurred, both designers utilizing hard-core pornstar Jeff Stryker in her SS92 collection to French clothing manufacturers using nude bodies to sell $100 T-shirts have shown that “sex sells” as well as porno francais does.
However, some claim the fashion industry has gone too far by crossing into pornography. Recently, the Italian fashion magazine NSS Mag published an (NSFW) quiz asking readers to distinguish between fashion photos and pornographic ones on its website. Its successful choices led to full-resolution pictures ranging from fashion spreads to graphic hard-core content (hello, private parts!).
NSS’s quiz may be entertaining and amusing, but it also highlights an ongoing discussion regarding when and how fashion crosses over into pornography. For some photographers such as Terry Richardson and American Apparel CEO Dov Charney – for whom porn is an aesthetic they draw inspiration from; in both instances, it seems to be making inroads into fashion culture with little sign of slowing down.
Why is pornography so popular in the fashion industry?
Why fashion has such an obsession with pornography is a complex question. One factor may be the blurring lines between art, commerce, and decency; fashion is perceived as high culture while pornography is low culture, both tending towards the degradation of human bodies.
However, using pornographic imagery in fashion is more than a trend; it represents a broader phenomenon known as “pornification,” which refers to an increasing presence and acceptance of sexual themes and images within mainstream culture – including fashion, film, music, and art industries. This trend can be found elsewhere, such as in film production companies.
Fashion designers and photographers have increasingly employed sexually explicit imagery in their ads to draw consumers in and sell products. This trend relies on nude models’ use and the sexualization of female body parts. Tom Ford featured one advertisement that showed a scantily clad woman holding up a perfume bottle between her breasts and genitals, while another from Diesel depicted an arched-back woman lying down wearing only bikinis; such imagery is indecent of fashion companies as it sexualizes and inappropriately exploits women.
Pornography remains a highly contentious subject for several reasons
Most notably, linked to prostitution, trafficking, and modern forms of slavery – it also serves various industries, including military organizations, alcohol/drug firms, and fashion brands, as a marketing strategy.
Finally, pornography can often serve to advance sexism and misogyny; therefore, it should come as no surprise that some find it offensive. Unfortunately, criticizing pornography usually occurs without understanding its production, distribution, and consumption context – leading to discussions that focus solely on moral or aesthetic considerations without considering all aspects of an issue.
Fashion may often err towards graphic, provocative advertising. However, there are fashion houses that do not cross this line. For instance, in November, Paris-based brand Balenciaga ran two ads featuring references such as sadomasochism and violence that did not go well with the public.
Why is pornography so crucial to the fashion industry?
Fashion has recently become more sexualized and explicit due to a change in society’s views of sex and gender over recent decades. Many top photographers use pornography as inspiration in their work; brands even employ this strategy when marketing their products.
One key factor driving the rise of pornography is its accessibility through the internet, enabling people worldwide to access it at any time and from any place. Another contributor is that pornography has become more mainstream; more people than ever before use it, and this has allowed sexualized fashion trends to become acceptable and explicit.
Pornography’s impact has seen fashion more accepting of fetish clothing and accessories, leading designers to include these items in their collections and creating more fetish fashion shows than ever.
Pornography can have a devastating impact on society, mainly because it glamorizes female bodies. But it is essential to remember that pornography doesn’t always imply negative connotations; there may be instances when some forms of erotica can be considered positive influences.
Fashion has taken to pornography partly because it allows them to market their products more creatively. Many designers use provocative poses and suggestive language in advertisements to draw customers’ attention – which helps increase sales while making their products more desirable to potential buyers.
Many people enjoy watching pornography and find it entertaining, resulting in the rise in popularity of websites and magazines devoted to it. Porn has become an integral part of the culture and influences different industries such as fashion.
As a result, more fashion brands are using pornography in their advertising campaigns – an indicator that the fashion industry is shifting and becoming more accepting of sexuality.
Why is pornography so controversial in the fashion industry?
Fashion and pornography overlap in multiple ways, with fashion imagery often crossing into pornographic realms. One example is with fashion industry ads featuring models who appear nearly or fully naked – an attempt by advertisers to stimulate consumer’s sexual appetite to sell more clothes; some argue, however, that using such imagery is inappropriate or degrading.
One reason some individuals object to using pornographic imagery in fashion is because they feel it promotes an unhealthy view of women. They argue it sends the message that women exist solely as objects for male sexual gratification, with their bodies serving no other purpose but pleasing men sexually. Furthermore, some claim it encourages violence against women by normalizing acts like rape, sexual assault, and other abuse against female bodies.
Others dispute this claim and contend that pornography does not present an inherent threat. They point out how some of the most iconic fashion photos of Guy Bourdin or Helmut Newton featuring nude models were not as damaging as newer pornographic xxx photographs depicting naked women.
Others maintain that censoring pornography violates freedom of expression, violating an individual’s constitutional right. This view has been advanced both by feminists who oppose censorship as well as traditional liberal defenders of free speech rights.
Controversy surrounding pornography and fashion is complex due to the difficulty of defining what pornography is and distinguishing it from other forms of art and entertainment. Some have argued for a broader definition of pornography to combat the increasing sexualization of culture – not only sexually explicit material but any art that promotes harmful views of women or endorses violent treatment against them would fall within its definition.